There are few that would argue for carbon offset projects a system that does damage to the environment if there was no benefit to it. When a product is being manufactured and one method does damage but another does not, people will choose a side based upon their personal values, if the cost savings is worth the damage that is done. This is the case with electrical production using either green technologies or fossil fuels. If you burn fossil fuels to produce electricity it does some amount of damage to the environment. Green energy production does not damage the environment the same way, but costs more. This forces people to decide if they are willing to pay more for the same product if the method of production does less environmental damage. If you loved this post and you would like to get more info regarding carbon Credits Price kindly visit the web page. Most people will choose to pay less.

The debate would effectively end if green energy production methods would also cost less in addition to being cleaner, and as a result of this fact experts are continually producing new methods to reduce the costs. The primary source of cost in green energy is obviously not the fuel sources which are free, and instead can be found in damage to components in the field, and also the downtimes as a result of that damage that reduces efficiency. Green energy can only be produced when the sun is shining or the wind is blowing, so every minute that is wasted by a system being offline during a prime time ultimately causes the prices to go up. Reducing equipment damage solves both these issues, and ultimately the cause of the majority of damage is also easily identified. Lightning striking the components themselves or the exposed portions of the site are the issue. While lighting strike point damage is almost unavoidable, the surges that do the majority of the damage to components are not. The systems involve computer components that are chained together through data transfer lines and power cords. The damage that happens to circuits is a result of power surges coupling into these lines and being allowed to flow unabridged to the next component in line. Stop this surge of power at the line itself and you stop the damage to the next component. This is achieved through the integration of more robust surge protection devices. The better the surge protection devices are, the more avoidance of damage there can be. As a matter of fact the latest generation of surge protection devices actually do not need replugged or reset after they do their job, ultimately cutting down on the time it takes to restore functionality to the system. This improves efficiency at the same time as reducing damage costs.

We are quickly approaching an efficiency level in green production methods that will reduce costs that consumers must pay to a point lower than fossil fuels. Of course there will be some publicity effort to mislead the public about the situation, but once the facts are out we can assume that there will be no reason to debate the issue any longer.








Raymond Santopietro is a technology expert and blogger. His favorite SPD company is Raycap .